1. How Are Encryption Keys Securely Generated Windows 7
2. How Are Encryption Keys Securely Generated In India
3. How Are Encryption Keys Securely Generated Free
4. What Are Encryption Keys

• Apr 16, 2018  These keys will not be used for encryption of any kind. Alice and Bob use a key exchange algorithm such as Diffie-Hellman-Merkle, to securely agree on an ephemeral (short lived) session key.
• Sep 01, 2015 I have to disagree with the other answer here: there is very much a way to store an encryption key securely, under certain circumstances. To store it securely, encrypt it.
• Encryption keys can be generated by the encryption key server, by applications such as Tivoli Storage Manager, or by a utility such as keytool. The responsibility for generating AES keys and the manner in which they are transferred to the tape drive depends on the tape drive type and the method of encryption management.

CD-Keys aren't much of a security for any non-networked stuff, so technically they don't need to be securely generated. If you're on.net, you can almost go with Guid.NewGuid. Their main use nowadays is for the Multiplayer component, where a server can verify the CD Key. Feb 20, 2018  how encryption keys being generated? - posted in Encryption Methods and Programs: Hi All, Im a novice and was unable to understand the correct procedure in.

In addition to controlling access, you can also encrypt data to reduce your security risks. However, data encryption is not an infallible solution. This chapter discusses the appropriate uses of data encryption and provides examples of using data encryption in applications. It contains the following topics:

Securing Sensitive Information

While the Internet poses new challenges in information security, many of them can be addressed by the traditional arsenal of security mechanisms:

• Strong user authentication to identify users

• Granular access control to limit what users can see and do

• Auditing for accountability

• Network encryption to protect the confidentiality of sensitive data in transmission

Encryption is an important component of several of these solutions. For example, Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), an Internet-standard network encryption and authentication protocol, uses encryption to strongly authenticate users by means of X.509 digital certificates. SSL also uses encryption to ensure data confidentiality, and cryptographic checksums to ensure data integrity. Many of these uses of encryption are relatively transparent to a user or application. For example, many browsers support SSL, and users generally do not need to do anything special to enable SSL encryption.

Oracle has provided network encryption between database clients and the Oracle database since version 7. Oracle Advanced Security, an option to the Oracle Database server, provides encryption and cryptographic checksums for integrity checking with any protocol supported by the database, including Oracle Net, Java Database Connectivity (JDBC—both thick and thin JDBC), and the Internet Intra-Orb Protocol (IIOP). Oracle Advanced Security also supports SSL for Oracle Net, thick JDBC, and IIOP connections.

While encryption is not a security cure-all, it is an important tool in addressing specific security threats. In particular, the rapid growth of e-business has spurred increased encryption of stored data, such as credit card numbers. While SSL is typically used to protect these numbers in transit to a Web site, where data is not protected as it is in storage, the file system or database storing them often does so as clear text (unencrypted). Information stored in the clear is then directly accessible to anyone who can break into the host and gain root access, or gain illicit access to the database.

Databases can be made quite secure through proper configuration, but they can also be vulnerable to host break-ins if the host is misconfigured. In well-publicized break-ins, a hacker obtained a large list of credit card numbers by breaking into a database. Had the data been encrypted, the stolen information would have been useless. Encryption of stored data can thus be an important tool in limiting information loss even in the normally rare occurrence that access controls are bypassed.

Principles of Data Encryption

While there are many good reasons to encrypt data, there are many reasons not to. Encryption does not solve all security problems, and may even make some problems worse. The following sections describe some misconceptions about encryption of stored data:

Principle 1: Encryption Does Not Solve Access Control Problems

Most organizations need to limit data access to those who have a need to know. For example, a human resources system may limit employees to viewing only their own employment records, while allowing managers of employees to see the employment records of subordinates. Human resource specialists may also need to see employee records for multiple employees.

This type of security policy limiting data access to those with a need to see it is typically addressed by access control mechanisms. Oracle Database has provided strong, independently-evaluated access control mechanisms for many years. It enables access control enforcement to an extremely fine level of granularity through its Virtual Private Database capability.

Because human resource records are considered sensitive information, it is tempting to think that all information should be encrypted for better security. However, encryption cannot enforce granular access control, and it may actually hinder data access. For example, an employee, his manager, and a human resources clerk may all need to access an employee record. If all employee data is encrypted, then all three must be able to access the data in un-encrypted form. Therefore, the employee, the manager and the HR clerk would have to share the same encryption key to decrypt the data. Encryption would therefore not provide any additional security in the sense of better access control, and the encryption might actually hinder the proper or efficient functioning of the application. An additional issue is that it is very difficult to securely transmit and share encryption keys among multiple users of a system.

A basic principle behind encrypting stored data is that it must not interfere with access control. For example, a user who has the SELECT privilege on EMP should not be limited by the encryption mechanism from seeing all the data he is otherwise allowed to see. Similarly, there is little benefit to encrypting part of a table with one key and part of a table with another key if users need to see all encrypted data in the table. It merely adds to the overhead of decrypting the data before users can read it. If access controls are implemented well, then encryption adds little additional security within the database itself. Any user who has privilege to access data within the database has no more nor any less privilege as a result of encryption. Therefore, encryption should never be used to solve access control problems.

Principle 2: Encryption Does Not Protect Against a Malicious DBA

Some organizations, concerned that a malicious user might gain elevated (DBA) privileges by guessing a password, like the idea of encrypting stored data to protect against this threat. However, the correct solution to this problem is to protect the DBA account, and to change default passwords for other privileged accounts. The easiest way to break into a database is by using a default password for a privileged account that an administrator has allowed to remain unchanged. One example is SYS/CHANGE_ON_INSTALL.

While there are many destructive things a malicious user can do to a database after gaining DBA privilege, encryption will not protect against many of them. Examples include corrupting or deleting data, exporting user data to the file system to mail the data back to himself so as to run a password cracker on it, and so on.

Some organizations are concerned that DBAs, typically having all privileges, are able to see all data in the database. These organizations feel that the DBAs should merely administer the database, but should not be able to see the data that the database contains. Some organizations are also concerned about concentrating so much privilege in one person, and would prefer to partition the DBA function, or enforce two-person access rules.

It is tempting to think that encrypting all data (or significant amounts of data) will solve these problems, but there are better ways to protect against these threats. For example, Oracle Database does support limited partitioning of DBA privileges. Oracle Database provides native support for SYSDBA and SYSOPER users. SYSDBA has all privileges, but SYSOPER has a limited privilege set (such as startup and shutdown of the database).

Furthermore, an organization can create smaller roles encompassing a number of system privileges. A JR_DBA role might not include all system privileges, but only those appropriate to a junior DBA (such as CREATE TABLE, CREATE USER, and so on).

Oracle Database also enables auditing the actions taken by SYS (or SYS-privileged users) and storing that audit trail in a secure operating system location. Using this model, a separate auditor who has root privileges on the operating system can audit all actions by SYS, enabling the auditor to hold all DBAs accountable for their actions.

See Also:

'Auditing Administrative Users' for information about using the AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS parameter.

The DBA function by its nature is a trusted position. Even organizations with the most sensitive data such as intelligence agencies do not typically partition the DBA function. Instead, they vet their DBAs strongly, because it is a position of trust. Periodic auditing can help to uncover inappropriate activities.

Encryption of stored data must not interfere with the administration of the database, because otherwise, larger security issues can result. For example, if by encrypting data you corrupt the data, then you create a security problem, the data itself becomes uninterpretable, and it may not be recoverable.

Encryption can be used to limit the ability of a DBAor other privileged user to see data in the database. However, it is not a substitute for vetting a DBA properly, or for controlling the use of powerful system privileges. If untrustworthy users have significant privileges, then they can pose multiple threats to an organization, some of them far more significant than viewing unencrypted credit card numbers.

Principle 3: Encrypting Everything Does Not Make Data Secure

A common error is to think that if encrypting some data strengthens security, then encrypting everything makes all data secure.

As the discussion of the prior two principles illustrates, encryption does not address access control issues well, and it is important that encryption not interfere with normal access controls. Furthermore, encrypting an entire production database means that all data must be decrypted to be read, updated, or deleted. Encryption is inherently a performance-intensive operation, encrypting all data will significantly affect performance.

Availability is a key aspect of security. If encrypting data makes data unavailable, or adversely affects availability by reducing performance, then encrypting everything will create a new security problem. Availability is also adversely affected by the database being inaccessible when encryption keys are changed, as good security practices require on a regular basis. When the keys are to be changed, the database is inaccessible while data is decrypted and re-encrypted with a new key or keys.

However, there may be advantages to encrypting data stored off-line. For example, an organization may store backups for a period of six months to a year off-line, in a remote location. Of course, the first line of protection is to secure the facility storing the data, by establishing physical access controls. Encrypting this data before it is stored may provide additional benefits. Because it is not being accessed on-line, performance need not be a consideration. While an Oracle database server does not provide this capability, there are vendors who can provide such encryption services. Before embarking on large-scale encryption of backup data, organizations considering this approach should thoroughly test the process. It is essential to verify that data encrypted before off-line storage can be decrypted and re-imported successfully.

Stored Data Encryption Using DBMS_CRYPTO

The DBMS_CRYPTO package provides several means for addressing the security issues that have been discussed. (For backward compatibility, DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT is also provided.) This section includes these topics:

DBMS_CRYPTO Hashing and Encryption Capabilities

While encryption is not the ideal solution for addressing a number of security threats, it is clear that selectively encrypting sensitive data before storage in the database does improve security. Examples of such data could include:

• Credit card numbers

• National identity numbers

To address these needs, Oracle Database provides the PL/SQL package DBMS_CRYPTO to encrypt and decrypt stored data. This package supports several industry-standard encryption and hashing algorithms, including the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption algorithm. AES has been approved by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to replace the Data Encryption Standard (DES).

The DBMS_CRYPTO package enables encryption and decryption for common Oracle data types, including RAW and large objects (LOBs), such as images and sound. Specifically, it supports BLOBs and CLOBs. In addition, it provides Globalization Support for encrypting data across different database character sets.

The following cryptographic algorithms are supported:

How Are Encryption Keys Securely Generated Windows 7

• Data Encryption Standard (DES), Triple DES (3DES, 2-key)

• Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)

• SHA-1 Cryptographic Hash

• SHA-1 Message Authentication Code (MAC)

Block cipher modifiers are also provided with DBMS_CRYPTO. You can choose from several padding options, including Public Key Cryptographic Standard (PKCS) #5, and from four block cipher chaining modes, including Cipher Block Chaining (CBC). Padding must be done in multiples of eight bytes.

Note:

• DES is no longer recommended by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

• Usage of SHA-1 is more secure than MD5.

• Keyed MD5 is not vulnerable.

Table 17-1 compares the DBMS_CRYPTO package features to the other PL/SQL encryption package, the DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT.

Table 17-1 DBMS_CRYPTO and DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT Feature Comparison

Package Feature	DBMS_CRYPTO	DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT
Cryptographic algorithms	DES, 3DES, AES, RC4, 3DES_2KEY	DES, 3DES
Padding forms	PKCS5, zeroes	None supported
Block cipher chaining modes	CBC, CFB, ECB, OFB	CBC
Cryptographic hash algorithms	SHA-1	MD5
Keyed hash (MAC) algorithms	HMAC_MD5, HMAC_SH1	None supported
Cryptographic pseudo-random number generator	RAW, NUMBER, BINARY_INTEGER	RAW, VARCHAR2
Database types	RAW, CLOB, BLOB	RAW, VARCHAR2

DBMS_CRYPTO is intended to replace the obfuscation toolkit, because it is easier to use and supports a range of algorithms accommodating both new and existing systems. Although 3DES_2KEY and MD4 are provided for backward compatibility, you achieve better security using 3DES, AES, or SHA-1. Therefore, 3DES_2KEY is not recommended.

The DBMS_CRYPTO package includes cryptographic checksum capabilities (MD5), which are useful for compares, and the ability to generate a secure random number (the RANDOMBYTES function). Secure random number generation is an important part of cryptography, predictable keys are easily-guessed keys, and easily-guessed keys may lead to easy decryption of data. Most cryptanalysis is done by finding weak keys or poorly stored keys, rather than through brute force analysis (cycling through all possible keys).

Note:

• Do not use DBMS_RANDOM as it is unsuitable for cryptographic key generation.

• For more detailed descriptions of both DBMS_CRYPTO and DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT, also refer to the PL/SQL Packages and Types Reference.

Key management is programmatic. That is, the application (or caller of the function) must supply the encryption key. This means that the application developer must find a way of storing and retrieving keys securely. The relative strengths and weaknesses of various key management techniques are discussed in the sections that follow. The DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT package, which can handle both string and raw data, requires the submission of a 64-bit key. The DES algorithm itself has an effective key length of 56-bits.

Note:

The DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT is granted to the PUBLIC role by default. Oracle strongly recommends that you revoke this grant.

While the DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT package can take either VARCHAR2 or RAW data types, it is preferable to use the RAW data type for keys and encrypted data. Storing encrypted data as VARCHAR2 can cause problems if it passes through Globalization Support routines. For example, when transferring database to a database that uses another character set.

To convert between VARCHAR2 and RAW data types, use the CAST_TO_RAW and CAST_TO_VARCHAR2 functions of the UTL_RAW package.

See Also:

PL/SQL Packages and Types Reference for detailed documentation of the DBMS_CRYPTO, DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT and UTL_RAW packages

Data Encryption Challenges

Even in cases where encryption can provide additional security, come with associated technical challenges, as described in the following sections:

Encrypting Indexed Data

Special difficulties arise in handling encrypted data that is indexed. For example, suppose a company uses a national identity number, such as the U.S. Social Security number (SSN), as the employee number for its employees. The company considers employee numbers to be very sensitive data and therefore wants to encrypt data in the EMPLOYEE_NUMBER column of the EMPLOYEES table. Because EMPLOYEE_NUMBER contains unique values, the database designers want to have an index on it for better performance.

However, if DBMS_CRYPTO or the DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT (or another mechanism) is used to encrypt data in a column, then an index on that column will also contain encrypted values. Although such an index can be used for equality checking (for example, 'SELECT * FROM emp WHERE employee_number = '123245'), if the index on that column contains encrypted values, then the index is essentially unusable for any other purpose. Oracle therefore recommends that developers not encrypt indexed data.

Given the privacy issues associated with overuse of national identity numbers (for example, identity theft), the fact that some allegedly unique national identity numbers have duplicates (as with U.S. Social Security numbers), and the ease with which a sequence can generate a unique number, there are many good reasons to avoid using national identity numbers as unique IDs.

Key Generation

Encrypted data is only as secure as the key used for encrypting it. An encryption key must be securely generated using secure cryptographic key generation. Oracle Database provides support for secure random number generation, with the RANDOMBYTES function of DBMS_CRYPTO. (This function replaces the capabilities provided by the GetKey procedure of the earlier DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT.) DBMS_CRYPTO calls the secure random number generator (RNG) previously certified by RSA.

Note:

Developers should not, under any circumstances use the DBMS_RANDOM package. The DBMS_RANDOM package generates pseudo-random numbers, which, as RFC-1750 states that the use of pseudo-random processes to generate secret quantities can result in pseudo-security.

Be sure to provide the correct number of bytes when you encrypt a key value. For example, you must provide a 16-byte key for the ENCRYPT_AES128 encryption algorithm.

Key Transmission

If the key is to be passed by the application to the database, then it must be encrypted. Otherwise, a snooper could grab the key as it is being transmitted. Use of network encryption, such as that provided by Oracle Advanced Security, will protect all data in transit from modification or interception, including cryptographic keys.

Key Storage

Key storage is one of the most important, yet difficult, aspects of encryption. To recover data encrypted with a symmetric key, the key must be accessible to an authorized application or user seeking to decrypt the data. At the same time, the key must be inaccessible to someone who is maliciously trying to access encrypted data that he is not supposed to see.

The options available to a developer are:

Storing the Keys in the Database

Storing the keys in the database cannot always provide infallible security if you are trying to protect against the DBA accessing encrypted data. An all-privileged DBA could still access tables containing encryption keys. However, it can often provide quite good security against the casual snooper or against someone compromising the database file on the operating system.

How Are Encryption Keys Securely Generated In India

As a trivial example, suppose you create a table (EMP) that contains employee data. You want to encrypt employee Social Security Number (SSN) stored in one of the columns. You could encrypt employee SSN using a key that is stored in a separate column. However, anyone with SELECT access on the entire table could retrieve the encryption key and decrypt the matching SSN.

While this encryption scheme seems easily defeated, with a little more effort you can create a solution that is much harder to break. For example, you could encrypt the SSN using a technique that performs some additional data transformation on the employee_number before using it to encrypt the SSN. This technique might be something as simple as XORing the employee_number with the birth date of the employee.

As additional protection, PL/SQL source code performing encryption can be wrapped, (using the WRAP utility) which obfuscates the code. The WRAP utility processes an input SQL file and obfuscates the PL/SQL units in it. For example, the following command uses the keymanage.sql file as the input:

A developer can subsequently have a function in the package call the DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT with the key contained in the wrapped package.

Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2) allows you to obfuscate dynamically generated PL/SQL code. The DBMS_DDL package contains two subprograms which allow you to obfuscate dynamically generated PL/SQL program units. For example, the following block uses the DBMS_DDL.CREATE_WRAPPED procedure to wrap dynamically generated PL/SQL code.

While wrapping is not unbreakable, it makes it harder for a snooper to get the key. Even in cases where a different key is supplied for each encrypted data value, not embedding the key value within a package, wrapping the package that performs key management (that is, data transformation or padding) is recommended.

See Also:

PL/SQL User's Guide and Reference for additional information on the WRAP command line utility and the DBMS_DDL subprograms for dynamic wrapping

An alternative would be to have a separate table in which to store the encryption key and to envelope the call to the keys table with a procedure. The key table can be joined to the data table using a primary key to foreign key relationship. For example, EMPLOYEE_NUMBER is the primary key in the EMPLOYEES table that stores employee information and the encrypted SSN. EMPLOYEE_NUMBER is a foreign key to the SSN_KEYS table that stores the encryption keys for employee SSN. The key stored in the SSN_KEYS table can also be transformed before use (by using XORing), so the key itself is not stored unencrypted. The procedure itself should be wrapped, to hide the way in which keys are transformed before use.

How Are Encryption Keys Securely Generated Free

The strengths of this approach are:

• Users who have direct table access cannot see the sensitive data unencrypted, nor can they retrieve the keys to decrypt the data.

• Access to decrypted data can be controlled through a procedure that selects the encrypted data, retrieves the decryption key from the key table, and transforms it before it can be used to decrypt the data.

• The data transformation algorithm is hidden from casual snooping by wrapping the procedure, which obfuscates the procedure code.

• SELECT access to both the data table and the keys table does not guarantee that the user with this access can decrypt the data, because the key is transformed before use.

The weakness in this approach is that a user who has SELECT access to both the key table and the data table, and who can derive the key transformation algorithm, can break the encryption scheme.

The preceding approach is not infallible, but it is good enough to protect against easy retrieval of sensitive information stored in clear text.

Storing the Keys in the Operating System

Storing keys in a flat file in the operating system is another option. Oracle Database enables you to make callouts from PL/SQL, which you could use to retrieve encryption keys. However, if you store keys in the operating system and make callouts to it, then your data is only as secure as the protection on the operating system. If your primary security concern driving you to encrypt data stored in the database is that the database can be broken into from the operating system, then storing the keys in the operating system arguably makes it easier for a hacker to retrieve encrypted data than storing the keys in the database itself.

Users Managing Their Own Keys

Having the user supply the key assumes the user will be responsible with the key. Considering that 40% of help desk calls are from users who have forgotten their passwords, you can see the risks of having users manage encryption keys. In all likelihood, users will either forget an encryption key, or write the key down, which then creates a security weakness. If a user forgets an encryption key or leaves the company, then your data is irrecoverable.

If you do elect to have user-supplied or user-managed keys, then you need to make sure you are using network encryption so that the key is not passed from the client to the server in the clear. You also must develop key archive mechanisms, which is also a difficult security problem. Key archives or backdoors create the security weaknesses that encryption is attempting to address in the first place.

Using Transparent Database Encryption

Transparent database encryption provides secure encryption with automatic key management for the encrypted tables. If the application requires protection of sensitive column data stored on the media, then transparent data encryption is a simple and fast way of achieving this.

See Also:

Oracle Database Advanced Security Administrator's Guide for more information on transparent data encryption

Changing Encryption Keys

Prudent security practice dictates that you periodically change encryption keys. For stored data, this requires periodically unencrypting the data, and reencrypting it with another well-chosen key. This would likely have to be done while the data is not being accessed, which creates another challenge. This is especially true for a Web-based application encrypting credit card numbers, because you do not want to shut down the entire application while you switch encryption keys.

BLOBS

Certain data types require more work to encrypt. For example, Oracle Database supports storage of Binary Large Objects (BLOBs), which let users store very large objects (for example, multiple gigabytes) in the database. A BLOB can be either stored internally as a column, or stored in an external file.

For an example of using DBMS_CRYPTO on BLOB data, refer to the section entitled Example of Encryption and Decryption Procedures for BLOB Data.

Example of a Data Encryption Procedure

The following sample PL/SQL program (dbms_crypto.sql) illustrates encrypting data. This example code does the following:

• DES-encrypts a string (VARCHAR2 type) after first converting it into RAW type.

  This step is necessary because encrypt and decrypt functions and procedures in DBMS_CRYPTO package work on the RAW data type only, unlike functions and packages in the DBMS_OBFUSCATION_TOOLKIT package.

• Shows how to create a 160-bit hash using SHA-1 algorithm.

• Demonstrates how MAC, a key-dependent one-way hash, can be computed using MD5 algorithm.

What Are Encryption Keys

The dbms_crypto.sql procedure follows:

Example of AES 256-Bit Data Encryption and Decryption Procedures

The following PL/SQL block block demonstrates how to encrypt and decrypt a predefined variable named input_string using the AES 256-bit algorithm with Cipher Block Chaining and PKCS #5 padding.

Example of Encryption and Decryption Procedures for BLOB Data

The following sample PL/SQL program (blob_test.sql) illustrates encrypting and decrypting BLOB data. This example code does the following, and prints out its progress (or problems) at each step:

• Creates a table for the BLOB column

• Inserts the raw values into that table

• Encrypts the raw data

• Decrypts the encrypted data

The blob_test.sql procedure follows: